The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act: A Milestone Achieving Pay Equity, But the Struggle Continues

One of the greatest battlegrounds in equal pay was marked by President Barack Obama when he signed into law the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in January 2009. Named for Lilly Ledbetter whose story, a woman battling unequal pay for twelve years and her unyielding search for justice gripped the country, this Act renewed the fight against pay discrimination. Nonetheless, even as the Act itself represents a pivotal moment in labor rights history, ongoing disparities in pay between the sexes and races suggest that very much remains to be done.

One of the greatest battlegrounds in equal pay was marked by President Barack Obama when he signed into law the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in January 2009.

President Barak Obama Signing the Lilly Ledbetter Equal Pay Bill in the East Room.

Lilly Ledbetter’s Story: The Catalyst of Change and Beginning of the Fair Pay Act

Lilly Ledbetter worked in the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company for almost twenty years until she found out that the pay that she received was still relatively lower compared to those of the same offices managed by men. Finally, after a brave and protracted legal battle following a loss because of the statute of limitation, her case reached the Queensland Supreme Court. That decision spotlighted a hugely important loophole in employment law: the clock on the statute of limitations began to run with the employer’s original decision to pay her less, not from each discriminatory paycheck she received.

The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act: Closing a Critical Loophole

It was to hold this particular injustice accountable that the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act became enacted. It amended the Civil Rights Act of 1964, providing that the 180-day statute of limitations for filing an equal-pay lawsuit based on discrimination resets with each new paycheck affected by that discriminatory action. This marked a monumental shift change acknowledging pay discrimination and covering its mostly covert nature within organizational context.

Effect of Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

This legislation allowed employees to go back up to six years in order to file suit against discriminatory wages, and since the inception of this legislation, mostly women and minority groups can challenge discriminatory wages. It’s increased employer knowledge of this significance relating to equitable pay and it has roused more public dialogue relative to compensation. But the Act addresses one’s ability to sue for compensation disparities, it doesn’t naturally solve insidious problems that lead to inequitable pay.

It’s a start, certainly. But we’re nowhere near the finish line.

 

Continuing Disparities and the Road Ahead – The Fair Pay Act Was Just the Starting Line

Although the given improvement is great, the gender payment gap remains ever strong. Recent research shows that women still get 82 cents per every dollar men earn, and for women of color – this number turns out even more tremendous.

  1. African American Women: African American women typically earned approximately 63 cents for every dollar earned by white, non-Hispanic men. This gap is even more pronounced in certain professions and regions.
  2. Hispanic or Latina Women: Hispanic or Latina women faced one of the widest gaps, earning on average just 55 cents for every dollar earned by white, non-Hispanic men. This disparity reflects both gender and ethnic wage gaps.
  3. Native American Women: Native American women earned about 60 cents on the dollar compared to white, non-Hispanic men. This group often faces unique challenges due to geographical and tribal diversity, which can further impact income levels.
  4. Asian American Women: The wage gap for Asian American women varied significantly by ethnicity. Overall, they earned roughly 85 cents for every dollar earned by white, non-Hispanic men. However, this average masks lower wages for specific groups within the Asian American community, like Vietnamese or Filipino women.
  5. Pacific Islander Women: Women from Pacific Islander backgrounds also experienced a significant wage gap, although specific statistics can vary. They generally earned less than white, non-Hispanic men, with disparities influenced by factors like location, education, and specific occupation.
  6. Multi-Racial Women: Women who identify as multi-racial or multi-ethnic often experience wage gaps that reflect the complex interplay of race and gender in wage settings. Their earnings relative to white, non-Hispanic men varied widely depending on their specific racial and ethnic makeup.

One of the greatest battlegrounds in equal pay was marked by President Barack Obama when he signed into law the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in January 2009.

Lilly Ledbetter photographed advocating for Equal Pay for Equal Work.

More work must be done – that cannot be denied.

  1. Further Improved Pay Transparency: Improved translucency of compensational practices which identify and address pay inequities at the systemic level, results in increasing levels of pay.
  2. Strengthened Mechanisms for Enforcement of Existing Laws: perhaps the commitment of more resources towards the relevant agencies like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) may be able to ensure better enforcement of existing laws.
  3. Pay Equity Legislation: This, for instance, includes higher-rank legislation in which deals with the inherent causes of wage inequity such as raising the wage and assuring pay equity value.
  4. Public Awareness and Corporate Accountability: There is no doubt that the campaign for pay equity in the corporate world has hit the center stage in public discourse and remaining alert towards making corporations accountable for proper dispensation in terms of pay is of critical importance.

The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act was a historic turn of events on the broader efforts of pay equity and this had far-reaching implications for the fair pay supporters. But, it is just one small step on a much longer march. True pay equity should continue to be worked with, legislated for, and committed at large from the participating society.

While strides are celebrated; let us also recognize the path ahead and collective act together ensuring fair pay for all.

If you’re interested in reading the full Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, you can access it in its entirety here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/senate-bill/181

If you feel you may be the victim of wage or gender discrimination, reach out to one of our expert wage discrimination and gender discrimination attorneys here: https://clgtrial.com/employment-intake-questionnaire/

Children’s Nightgowns Recalled Due to Fire and Burn Hazard; Violation of Federal Flammability Regulations; Imported by Stripe and Stare

The recalled children’s nightgowns violate the federal flammability regulations for children’s sleepwear, posing a risk of burn injuries to children.

Source: Recall List

Box Components Recalls BMX Race Bicycle Stems Due to Fall Hazard

The stems’ faceplate can crack and break, loosening the handlebars, and cause the rider to lose control, posing a risk of injury to the user in a crash.

Source: Recall List

BISSELL Recalls Multi Reach Hand and Floor Vacuum Cleaners Due to Fire Hazard

The vacuum’s battery pack can overheat and smoke, posing a fire hazard.

Source: Recall List

Snap Recalls Lithium-Ion Battery Sold for Pixy Flying Cameras Due to Fire Hazard

The lithium-ion battery in the camera can overheat, posing a fire hazard.

Source: Recall List

Huihuang Trading Recalls Fishing Games Due to Magnet Ingestion Hazard, Violation of the Federal Safety Regulation for Toys; Sold Exclusively on Amazon.com

The fishing game does not comply with the requirements of the mandatory federal toy regulation because it contains one or more magnets that fit within CPSC’s small parts cylinder and the magnets are stronger than permitted. When high-powered magnets are swallowed, the ingested magnets can attract to each other, or another metal object, and become lodged in the digestive system. This can result in perforations, twisting and/or blockage of the intestines, infection, blood poisoning and death.

Source: Recall List

SRAM Recalls Shift Brake Levers Due to Crash Hazard

The clamp bolt on the brake lever can come loose, posing a crash hazard to the rider. A rider uses the brake lever to activate the braking system to slow or stop the bicycle.

Source: Recall List

Lovevery Recalls Slide & Seek Ball Runs with Wooden Knobs Due to Choking Hazard

The packaging configuration can allow damage to the wooden knob on the Ball Run during shipping and cause it to come loose and detach, posing a choking hazard to children.

Source: Recall List

DailySale Recalls High-Powered Magnetic Balls Due to Ingestion Hazard; Violation of the Federal Safety Regulation for Toy Magnet Sets

The magnetic ball sets do not comply with the requirements of the mandatory federal toy regulation because they contain one or more magnets that fit within CPSC’s small parts cylinder and the magnets are stronger than permitted. When high-powered magnets are swallowed, the ingested magnets can attract to each other or to another metal object and become lodged in the digestive system. This can result in perforations, twisting and/or blockage of the intestines, infection, blood poisoning and death.

Source: Recall List

Children’s Nightgowns Recalled Due to Fire and Burn Hazard; Violation of Federal Flammability Regulations; Imported by Shenzhen Weite Information Technology Co., Ltd.; Sold Exclusively by Ekouaer at Amazon.com

The children’s nightgowns fail to meet federal flammability regulations for children’s sleepwear, posing a risk of burn injuries to children.

Source: Recall List