The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act: A Milestone Achieving Pay Equity, But the Struggle Continues

/1 Comment/in /by

One of the greatest battlegrounds in equal pay was marked by President Barack Obama when he signed into law the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in January 2009. Named for Lilly Ledbetter whose story, a woman battling unequal pay for twelve years and her unyielding search for justice gripped the country, this Act renewed the fight against pay discrimination. Nonetheless, even as the Act itself represents a pivotal moment in labor rights history, ongoing disparities in pay between the sexes and races suggest that very much remains to be done.

One of the greatest battlegrounds in equal pay was marked by President Barack Obama when he signed into law the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in January 2009.

President Barak Obama Signing the Lilly Ledbetter Equal Pay Bill in the East Room.

Lilly Ledbetter’s Story: The Catalyst of Change and Beginning of the Fair Pay Act

Lilly Ledbetter worked in the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company for almost twenty years until she found out that the pay that she received was still relatively lower compared to those of the same offices managed by men. Finally, after a brave and protracted legal battle following a loss because of the statute of limitation, her case reached the Queensland Supreme Court. That decision spotlighted a hugely important loophole in employment law: the clock on the statute of limitations began to run with the employer’s original decision to pay her less, not from each discriminatory paycheck she received.

The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act: Closing a Critical Loophole

It was to hold this particular injustice accountable that the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act became enacted. It amended the Civil Rights Act of 1964, providing that the 180-day statute of limitations for filing an equal-pay lawsuit based on discrimination resets with each new paycheck affected by that discriminatory action. This marked a monumental shift change acknowledging pay discrimination and covering its mostly covert nature within organizational context.

Effect of Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

This legislation allowed employees to go back up to six years in order to file suit against discriminatory wages, and since the inception of this legislation, mostly women and minority groups can challenge discriminatory wages. It’s increased employer knowledge of this significance relating to equitable pay and it has roused more public dialogue relative to compensation. But the Act addresses one’s ability to sue for compensation disparities, it doesn’t naturally solve insidious problems that lead to inequitable pay.

It’s a start, certainly. But we’re nowhere near the finish line.

 

Continuing Disparities and the Road Ahead – The Fair Pay Act Was Just the Starting Line

Although the given improvement is great, the gender payment gap remains ever strong. Recent research shows that women still get 82 cents per every dollar men earn, and for women of color – this number turns out even more tremendous.

  1. African American Women: African American women typically earned approximately 63 cents for every dollar earned by white, non-Hispanic men. This gap is even more pronounced in certain professions and regions.
  2. Hispanic or Latina Women: Hispanic or Latina women faced one of the widest gaps, earning on average just 55 cents for every dollar earned by white, non-Hispanic men. This disparity reflects both gender and ethnic wage gaps.
  3. Native American Women: Native American women earned about 60 cents on the dollar compared to white, non-Hispanic men. This group often faces unique challenges due to geographical and tribal diversity, which can further impact income levels.
  4. Asian American Women: The wage gap for Asian American women varied significantly by ethnicity. Overall, they earned roughly 85 cents for every dollar earned by white, non-Hispanic men. However, this average masks lower wages for specific groups within the Asian American community, like Vietnamese or Filipino women.
  5. Pacific Islander Women: Women from Pacific Islander backgrounds also experienced a significant wage gap, although specific statistics can vary. They generally earned less than white, non-Hispanic men, with disparities influenced by factors like location, education, and specific occupation.
  6. Multi-Racial Women: Women who identify as multi-racial or multi-ethnic often experience wage gaps that reflect the complex interplay of race and gender in wage settings. Their earnings relative to white, non-Hispanic men varied widely depending on their specific racial and ethnic makeup.

One of the greatest battlegrounds in equal pay was marked by President Barack Obama when he signed into law the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in January 2009.

Lilly Ledbetter photographed advocating for Equal Pay for Equal Work.

More work must be done – that cannot be denied.

  1. Further Improved Pay Transparency: Improved translucency of compensational practices which identify and address pay inequities at the systemic level, results in increasing levels of pay.
  2. Strengthened Mechanisms for Enforcement of Existing Laws: perhaps the commitment of more resources towards the relevant agencies like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) may be able to ensure better enforcement of existing laws.
  3. Pay Equity Legislation: This, for instance, includes higher-rank legislation in which deals with the inherent causes of wage inequity such as raising the wage and assuring pay equity value.
  4. Public Awareness and Corporate Accountability: There is no doubt that the campaign for pay equity in the corporate world has hit the center stage in public discourse and remaining alert towards making corporations accountable for proper dispensation in terms of pay is of critical importance.

The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act was a historic turn of events on the broader efforts of pay equity and this had far-reaching implications for the fair pay supporters. But, it is just one small step on a much longer march. True pay equity should continue to be worked with, legislated for, and committed at large from the participating society.

While strides are celebrated; let us also recognize the path ahead and collective act together ensuring fair pay for all.

If you’re interested in reading the full Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, you can access it in its entirety here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/senate-bill/181

If you feel you may be the victim of wage or gender discrimination, reach out to one of our expert wage discrimination and gender discrimination attorneys here: https://clgtrial.com/employment-intake-questionnaire/

Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (TCHRA): What Is It And How Does It Affect Texas Employees?

/in , /by

The Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (TCHRA), enacted in 1983, was designed to combat discrimination in workplaces, the TCHRA is a crucial piece of legislation that aligns with federal laws like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act.  As always with plaintiffs in Texas, the legislature giveth and the legislature taketh away.  Usually far more of the latter than the former.

Key Provisions of the TCHRA: The Good

Employment Discrimination

At its core, the TCHRA addresses employment discrimination. It applies to employers with 15 or more employees, including state and local governments. The act makes it illegal to discriminate in any aspect of employment, including hiring, firing, pay, job assignments, promotions, layoffs, training, fringe benefits, and any other term or condition of employment.

Disability Discrimination

The TCHRA also includes provisions for individuals with disabilities, aligning with the Americans with Disabilities Act. It requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations to employees with disabilities, as long as it does not cause undue hardship to the business.

Retaliation and Harassment

Retaliation against individuals who file discrimination claims, participate in an investigation, or oppose discriminatory practices is prohibited under the TCHRA. Additionally, the act covers harassment on the basis of a protected characteristic, creating a legal obligation for employers to ensure a workplace free from hostile or offensive environments.

Enforcement for Employees

The Texas Workforce Commission Civil Rights Division is responsible for enforcing the TCHRA. Individuals who believe they have been subjected to employment discrimination can file a complaint with this division, triggering an investigation process. If the commission finds evidence of discrimination, it attempts to resolve the issue through mediation or other means. If unresolved, legal action may be pursued.

Key Challenges of the TCHRA: The Bad

Stringent Filing Deadlines

One of the primary challenges for employees under the TCHRA is the stringent deadline for filing discrimination claims. The act requires that complaints be filed within a relatively short period from the alleged act of discrimination. This tight timeline can be a significant hurdle, particularly for those who may not immediately recognize the legal implications of their situation or for whom navigating the legal system is daunting.

Administrative Exhaustion Requirement

Before proceeding to court, employees must first file their discrimination claim with the Texas Workforce Commission Civil Rights Division (TWC-CRD) and allow the agency to investigate. This requirement, known as “administrative exhaustion,” can be time-consuming and may delay the ability to seek immediate redress through the courts. For some employees, this process can be disheartening and may dissuade them from pursuing their claim further.

Limited Damages and Remedies

The TCHRA caps the damages that can be awarded in successful discrimination cases, which can be a deterrent for employees seeking full compensation for their losses. These caps may not always fully cover the losses, especially in cases of severe discrimination or long-term career impacts. This limitation can affect the decision of employees to initiate or continue litigation, knowing the potential limitations on the outcome.

Burden of Proof

Employees bear the burden of proof in discrimination cases under the TCHRA. Proving discrimination can be complex and requires a thorough understanding of legal standards and evidence gathering. Employees without legal representation may find this burden particularly challenging.

Cost of Legal Representation

The cost of legal representation can be prohibitive for many employees. While the TCHRA aims to protect workers’ rights, the reality of legal expenses can be a significant barrier, especially for those with limited financial resources.

TCHRA’s Unintended Consequences:  The Ugly

Discouragement of Claims

The procedural and financial challenges posed by the TCHRA may discourage employees from filing legitimate discrimination claims. This unintended consequence can undermine the very purpose of the Act, which is to provide a remedy for workplace discrimination.

Employer Leverage

In some cases, the complexities and challenges of the TCHRA process can inadvertently provide employers with leverage. Employers with more resources and legal expertise may be better positioned to navigate the TCHRA’s requirements, potentially disadvantaging employees in disputes.

While the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act represents a significant effort to address workplace discrimination, its implementation reveals a more nuanced impact on employees seeking legal recourse. The procedural requirements, limited remedies, and legal complexities can pose significant challenges, sometimes making it difficult for employees to fully exercise their rights under the Act.

Victims of employment discrimination can be entitled to back pay, front pay, liquidated damages, attorney’s fees, and/or job reinstatement. But timing for a discrimination case is critical – a federal worker must generally file a complaint with the EEO office of their agency within 45 days of the discriminatory act and other workers generally have 180 to 300 days. Contact a Dallas, Texas discrimination lawyer at Carter Law Group, to immediately begin building a strong and effective case.

To set up a consultation, just submit our Employment Intake Questionnaire.

Sexual Assault in the Workplace: The 7 Risks Teenagers Face

/in , , /by

Teenage workers are at increased risk of sexual assault and sexual harassment in the workplace.

Teenagers entering the workforce are often faced with a unique set of challenges and vulnerabilities, one of which is the increased risk of experiencing sexual assault and harassment.  In fact, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) lists young workers as a key risk factor of workplace sexual harassment.  As they navigate the transition from school to employment, it’s crucial to recognize the factors that make teenagers in the workplace particularly vulnerable to these distressing situations. In this blog article, we will explore the reasons behind this vulnerability and discuss the importance of addressing and preventing sexual assault and harassment in the workplace.

Limited Experience and Knowledge: 

One of the key factors that make teenagers in the workplace vulnerable to sexual assault and harassment is their limited life and work experience. Often entering their first job, they may not fully understand their rights or recognize inappropriate behavior. This lack of experience can lead to confusion, making it easier for perpetrators to take advantage of their naivety.

Power Imbalance:

In many workplaces, there’s a distinct power imbalance between teenage employees and their supervisors or older colleagues. This power dynamic can be exploited by those in positions of authority, making teenagers feel powerless to report or resist harassment or assault. Fear of retaliation or job loss further silences young victims.

Peer Pressure:

Teenagers in the workplace may face pressure from their peers to conform to unhealthy workplace norms. They may hesitate to speak out about harassment or assault for fear of being ostracized by coworkers or labeled as troublemakers. Peer pressure can contribute to a culture of silence that allows harassment to persist.

Inadequate Training and Education:

Workplaces often lack comprehensive training and education programs for employees, especially younger workers. This leaves teenagers uninformed about what constitutes harassment or assault and how to report such incidents. Improved training can empower them to identify and address problematic behavior.

Financial Dependence:

Teenagers may rely on their jobs to support themselves or help their families financially. This financial dependence can create a sense of desperation to keep their jobs, even in the face of harassment or assault. Fear of job loss can trap them in abusive situations.

Limited Support Systems:

Teenagers may lack a strong support system at work, as they may not have established relationships with coworkers. Isolation can make them more vulnerable to harassment or assault and less likely to have allies who can help them navigate these difficult situations.

Stigmatization and Victim-Blaming:

Society often stigmatizes victims of sexual assault and harassment, blaming them for what happened. This stigma can be especially harmful to teenagers who may already be dealing with societal pressures, body image issues, and self-esteem challenges. The fear of being judged or blamed may deter them from reporting incidents.

It’s crucial to recognize and address the vulnerability of teenagers in the workplace to sexual assault and harassment. By acknowledging these risks and working to create safer, more supportive work environments, we can protect the rights and well-being of young workers. Employers, educators, and society as a whole must take steps to educate teenagers about their rights, provide support, and foster a culture that prioritizes respect and safety in the workplace. Empowering teenagers to speak out against harassment and assault is essential in creating a more inclusive and secure work environment for all.

For more information on sexual harassment in the workplace, go to Sexual Harassment | Carter Law Group (clgtrial.com)

Dallas sexual harassment and sexual assault lawyers at Carter Law Group are ready to build a strong and effective case for you. Contact us today. Call (214) 390-4173

 

Discrimination Intake Questionnaire